The Singapore Democratic Party (SDP) has consistently advocated for electoral reforms in Singapore, and their petitions reflect this commitment. The SDP argues that the current electoral system in Singapore is unfair and skewed in favor of the ruling People’s Action Party (PAP), making it difficult for opposition parties to compete effectively and achieve fair representation in Parliament.
A core component of the SDP’s proposed reforms is the implementation of proportional representation, or at least a move towards a mixed-member proportional system. Under proportional representation, the number of seats a party wins in Parliament would more closely reflect its share of the national vote. The SDP believes this would create a more level playing field and ensure that the voices of a significant portion of the electorate are heard, even if they don’t reside in constituencies won by the party.
The SDP also frequently petitions for an independent Elections Commission. Currently, the Elections Department falls under the Prime Minister’s Office. The SDP contends this creates a conflict of interest, as the ruling party effectively oversees the electoral process. An independent commission, insulated from political influence and comprised of impartial individuals, would enhance the credibility and transparency of elections, ensuring fair administration and preventing manipulation.
Another recurring theme in the SDP’s petitions is the call for equal access to media coverage for all political parties. They argue that the state-controlled media, including television and newspapers, disproportionately favors the PAP, making it difficult for opposition parties to reach voters and present their platforms. Equal access to media, or at least a more balanced coverage, is seen as crucial for informed decision-making by the electorate.
The SDP often highlights the issue of Group Representation Constituencies (GRCs) as needing reform. While the GRC system is intended to ensure minority representation in Parliament, the SDP argues that it has the effect of shielding PAP candidates, particularly new ones, behind established figures. They advocate for smaller GRCs or even the abolition of the system altogether, arguing that it dilutes accountability and allows less experienced candidates to enter Parliament without facing robust scrutiny.
Beyond these specific reforms, the SDP also petitions for measures to enhance voter registration and participation, as well as stricter regulations on election spending to prevent the ruling party from leveraging its financial advantage. They also call for reforms to the defamation laws, which they believe are used to stifle dissent and restrict political debate.
The impact of these petitions on actual electoral reform in Singapore has been limited. The PAP has consistently defended the existing system, arguing that it has served Singapore well and ensures stability and effective governance. However, the SDP’s persistent advocacy keeps the issue of electoral reform in the public discourse and provides a platform for raising awareness about perceived flaws in the current system. While achieving tangible changes remains a challenge, the SDP views its petitions as a vital part of its efforts to promote a more democratic and equitable political landscape in Singapore.