Swimming Upstream: RFK Jr. and Rock Creek

Robert F. Kennedy Jr.’s relationship with Rock Creek, the verdant oasis snaking through the heart of Washington D.C., is a complex and controversial one. For years, he has reportedly enjoyed swimming in its waters, a practice that draws both admiration for his environmental advocacy and sharp criticism for perceived hypocrisy. The creek’s health, or lack thereof, forms the crux of the debate.

Rock Creek, while visually appealing in many sections, suffers from the same ailments plaguing urban waterways worldwide: pollution. Runoff from streets and lawns carries pesticides, fertilizers, oil, and other contaminants into the creek, especially after heavy rainfall. Combined sewer overflows further exacerbate the problem, releasing untreated sewage directly into the water. This contamination makes the creek unsuitable for swimming for much of the year.

Kennedy Jr., a prominent environmental lawyer and activist, is acutely aware of these issues. He has dedicated his career to fighting polluters and advocating for clean water. His organization, Riverkeeper, has been instrumental in cleaning up the Hudson River in New York, demonstrating his commitment to environmental restoration. This context makes his choice to swim in Rock Creek all the more intriguing.

Critics argue that Kennedy Jr.’s swims send a mixed message. They claim his actions normalize swimming in potentially hazardous water, potentially encouraging others to do the same, especially those unaware of the creek’s contamination levels. Furthermore, some perceive it as a form of elitism, suggesting that his position shields him from the consequences of exposure to polluted water, consequences less privileged individuals might face. These critics suggest that his actions undermine his credibility as an environmental advocate, painting him as someone willing to disregard his own warnings.

However, supporters argue that Kennedy Jr.’s swims are a deliberate act of advocacy. They believe he’s drawing attention to the creek’s plight, using his visibility to highlight the need for improved water quality and greater investment in infrastructure upgrades. He’s, in essence, using his body as a symbol, a reminder of the urgent need to restore urban waterways to health, making them safe and accessible for everyone. His actions, according to this viewpoint, are a bold statement intended to shock people into recognizing the problem and demanding action from policymakers.

Whether a calculated statement or a personal indulgence, RFK Jr.’s relationship with Rock Creek underscores the challenges of urban environmentalism. It raises important questions about the role of advocacy, personal responsibility, and the need for accessible and clean waterways for all. It also forces a critical examination of the complex intersection of environmental issues, personal choices, and public perception.